Search
Close this search box.

Cross-Linking in the USA – Part 2: Best Practice

Follow best-practice

Anaesthesia

Topical, usually with tetracaine or proparacaine, although children and non-cooperative patients may require alternative forms of anaesthesia. CXL using standard (Dresden/FDA-approved) protocols, once riboflavin soaking before UV illumination, followed by 30 minutes of UV-A illumination can take over an hour to complete, so topical anaesthesia will need to be repeatedly administered during the procedure. An additional advantage of topical anaesthesia is that it weakens epithelial bonds, making epithelial removal easier.

Corneal abrasion

cxl-in-the-usa-debrided-epithelium-wikipedia
Debrided epithelium

Removal of the central 9.0 mm of the corneal epithelium is a crucial step: it enables riboflavin to penetrate into the collagen-rich stroma where the cross-linking reaction occurs. There are multiple options to achieve this:

  • With a blunt instrument (e.g. a hockey knife), used at a shallow angle to avoid damaging Bowman’s membrane
  • A mechanical brush
  • Topical alcohol (similar to how epithelial removal is performed in PRK)

                                                                                                                                    

Riboflavin and illumination 

As mentioned above, there are two FDA-approved riboflavin formulations available currently – the isotonic formulation, Photrexa Viscous, and the hypoosomlar formulation, Photrexa, however both are used in the same way. Nevertheless, both solutions should be before performing procedure, as corneal thickness can reduce periproceduralally due to fluid evaporation, and Photrexa use can help swell the cornea.

The cross-linking process is performed as follows:

AC, anterior chamber; q, quaque (every).

Understanding potential complications

The importance of discussing with patients, preoperatively, the potential complications that may arise from the cross-linking procedure (including treatment failure) cannot be underestimated. Complications like corneal haze, scarring, infective keratitis and sterile infiltrates, corneal perforation, photophobia, and excessive flattening with a hyperopic shift are all rare, but possible, issues. Treatment failure can occur, sometimes in as many as 8 in 100 patients, with the most significant risk factor for this being high preoperative maximum keratometry.

Haze

Many patients will experience early postoperative stromal haze, but this results from the healing processes that occur in response to the cross-linking procedure. It typically peaks at one month and then stabilizes over the next year. However, around 8% of patients undergoing CXL will experience significant stromal haze that persists for over 1 year, results in a significant decrease in visual acuity, and is resistant to steroid treatment. The Corneal Society’s authors note that “Advanced keratoconus should be considered at a higher risk for haze development after standard epithelium-off cross-linking.”

What causes CXL-induced haze is still unclear, but both in vivo and in vitro confocal microscopy studies have suggested that “CXL results in acute loss of keratocytes in the anterior corneal stroma followed by activated keratocyte repopulation started by 2 months and completed around 6 months”, so it is possible that these activated keratocytes are producing abnormal collagen which might contribute to the development of post-CXL corneal haze.

Flattening

Strengthening the cornea flattens the cone – CXL gives increases the biomechanical strength of the cornea and more able to counteract the intraocular pressure that presses against the cornea and makes it bulge in the weakest parts. Most eyes experience a 1­–2.6 D flattening of the cornea in the two years after the procedure. Rarely, flattening in the order of 5 D can occur, although this appears to be more common in the corneas of children who have under gone CXL than other patient populations.

Infection

Corneal infection – infectious keratitis – in an incredibly rare complication of CXL. One study of CXL performed at a tertiary care center in India (4) performed a retrospective analysis of 2350 procedures reported an incidence of infection of 0.0017%. However rare, it is a severe complication, that risks corneal melting and scarring that result in losses of visual acuity that require corneal transplantation to rectify.

It’s worth noting that only two cases of fungal keratitis (fusarium and microsporidia) and one case of Acanthamoeba have ever been reported. UV irradiation kills both bacteria and fungi, so it’s likely that any corneal infection in this context occurs in the early postoperative period, rather than during surgery. The method of cross-linking and how the UV energy is applied does not appear to affect the infection rates; although there is some indication that infection might be related to the type of epithelial defect present in the cross-linked eye. Most of the time, the offending pathogens are gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus oralis) although sometimes gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Acanthamoeba keratitis should be considered in any treatment-resistant case, particularly in patients with poor hygiene and in cases where symptoms (such as pain) are out of proportion to signs.

Management should follow standard procedures for corneal infection treatment: culture and gram stains should be considered for all cases; small, superficial infiltrates can be treated topically with antibiotic monotherapy, but bigger or more unresponsive infiltrates have to be treated more aggressively with multiple agents. Fungal keratitis should be suspected in all cases that do not respond to antibiotic treatment.

Finally, if patients have a history of herpetic disease, then systemic antiviral prophylaxis should be considered before CXL is performed.

Part 3: Off-label applications

The ELZA Institute

Search
Close this search box.
EN | DE | PT
.
.
Augeninstitut ELZA
4.8
Based on 109 reviews
powered by Google
mike
mike
09:02 04 Jan 23
Overall as a 50 year old, who wanted to continue to avoid wearing glasses and/or contact lenses, my goal was 100%... achieved with ELZA and Dr. Hafezi. I greatly appreciated the overall approach by Dr. Hafezi and his friendly and competent team in reviewing my vision at the start and following a comprehensive eye exam- the explanations of my options. For me I chose PRK in one eye for a monovision solution to correct short sightedness which was becoming more prevalent in night driving and sports such as skiing and cycling. PRK heals slowly but the outcome is worth the wait- and the cost- you use your eyes every waking moment- and for me I cannot see any reason not to pursue better vision with the ELZA team! A great quality of life enhancement!read more
Zuzana Fecko
Zuzana Fecko
21:48 31 Oct 22
Thank you so much, Dr. Torres and prof. Hafezi. 26 years I was only “dreaming” about the eye surgery due to possible... complications. I was worried ..Thank you for encouraging me to make a decision and thank you for your professionalism, explanations and great work!I wish you all the best, lots of success and only happy patients!read more
Serena Fazio
Serena Fazio
11:15 06 Mar 22
I have been to the ELZA clinic to have surgery for my miopy, as my eyes were rejecting the contacts and I was tired of... wearing glasses. From the first preliminary visit, to the actual surgery and post-surgery care Dr. Hafezi and all his collaborators have been extremely professional, considerate and helpful. All the steps of the (very short!) surgery were thoroughly explained to me in order to be as calm as possible, together with the medication plan and precautions to be aware of so that my eyes could heal in the best way possible. By following their exact instructions, the healing process has been very successful and smooth, and after about one week I was able to see perfectly. I absolutely recommend this team and their expertise!read more
Robin A
Robin A
11:43 16 Feb 22
Top experts and professional team. Highly recommended
Thunder Shiviah
Thunder Shiviah
14:05 23 Nov 21
After some research on local options I decided to go with ELZA since it stood out as the best. The operation and the... post-operation recovery went extremely smooth (something I was worried about with PRK). Now my vision is much better than I had hoped and I have no side effects such as dry eye or night vision problems. Thank you!read more
Thomas S.
Thomas S.
09:37 07 Jul 21
My left eye had to be operated on because of a cataract. As I had an Artiflex lens implanted a few years ago, it had to... be removed first before a modern lens could be implanted to correct the cataract. Prof. Hafezi treated me in an very competent and friendly manner. I am very happy with the result.read more
Selma A. Rahim
Selma A. Rahim
19:45 02 Jul 21
Dr. Hafezi.. the KING OF CXL🤴
Gianluca Ricci
Gianluca Ricci
12:46 10 Apr 21
Great team and service!
rehaneyecare
rehaneyecare
05:36 08 Apr 21
Excellent surgeon
Steven H.A
Steven H.A
16:13 11 Jan 21
Prof. F. Hafezi s expertise is enormous and he has a very pleasant and calm nature which gives the patient... security.Thank youread more
Online Commande
Online Commande
09:19 05 Dec 20
Totally creepy, very arrogant Prof.He just want your money.It may explain, why this Prof. is not in the center of the... city of Zürich and why he has been thrown away from University of Geneva.read more
Elena Churilova
Elena Churilova
10:06 17 Nov 20
At the moment, 3 months have passed since the moment I made laser vision correction in this clinic. and I can say that... I am happy that I chose this particular clinic and Prof. F. Hafezi. The entire staff of the clinic is very friendly, treats patients with sympathy and patience if they are nervous before surgery (my big gratitude to Aida Alili for all support and patience). The doctor Hafezi and other doctors of the clinic are very professional and ready to explain to you as many times as you need. I can only recommend!read more
Michele Aggiato
Michele Aggiato
18:17 10 Jan 20
The day I had Prof Hafezi checking my keratoconus I knew I was finally in the right place after years of searching for... a good ophthalmologist. Prof Hafezi recommended a surgery due to a drastic degeneration of my cornea. The surgery was performed by himself with the assistance of Dr Rodriguez, one more collaborator of Prof Hafezi’s team who got my full trust.read more
Ashley Faulkes
Ashley Faulkes
15:30 21 Mar 16
Professor Hafezi and the team at the ELZA Institute have done an amazing job of creating a first class eye clinic, with... cutting edge technology and support. I went there for a dry eye issue and other issues with my prescription, and they were easily able to help me and put me on the road to better vision! High recommend them to anyone in the Zurich/Aargau area.read more
More reviews
js_loader
Augeninstitut ELZA
4.8
Based on 109 reviews
powered by Google
js_loader